The 1843 novel “A Christmas Carol” by Charles Dickens is one of my all-time favorite tales to be associated with the holiday season, and it’s arguably been adapted into more mediums than any other holiday themed story. While I have my movie adaptations that I feel best capture the spirit of the source material, I also find myself drawn to the versions that have their own distinct style, personality and approach. For instance, adapting the Dickens classic into a musical is an especially appealing concept, and is only fitting as “Carol” is in the title.
While there have been several musical renditions of “A Christmas Carol” in the past, my personal favorite is the 2004 movie simply titled “A Christmas Carol: The Musical”. I'm sure most fans prefer either the 1970 musical "Scrooge" or "The Muppet Christmas Carol" from 1992, which is perfectly understandable ... the Muppet version is certainly a close second favorite of mine. Nevertheless, it's the 2004 movie musical I find myself most drawn back too. Now to be blunt right out the gate, this film is far from perfect, and won't be for everyone, but even with its admitted short comings, it still feels special to me. It's adapted from the 1994 stage musical by Alan Menken and Lynn Ahrens, both of whom continued to work on the film, with Arthur Allan Seidelman directing, Hallmark distributing, and Kelsey Grammer in the lead role of Ebenezer Scrooge.
Naturally, Mr. Scrooge is the meanest and greediest man in London, who thinks little of his fellow man. Yet, one magical Christmas Eve, he’s visited by four ghosts, one being his late business partner Jacob Marley, and the other three being the spirits of Christmas past, present and future.
Together they take Scrooge on a journey across time and space to see what made him such a miser, and to see if both the value and spirit of the season can reform him. This film stands apart from most others with an over the top, tongue and check quality, and as such, it’s going to be an acquired taste for some. For my liking, sense it’s a musical, I feel it has the right to be more colorful and bombastic with its presentation, and the film isn’t ashamed to go all the way. In comparison to the 1970 movie musical “Scrooge”, that film was just as over the top and cheerful in tone, but it mostly had a dinge look and design no different than other proper movie adaptations. By contrast, this 2004 movie musical maintains its gas-lamp, London setting, but it’s very colorful and highly decorated, which for me compliments the musical tone and personality of the film. Honestly, of all the live action “Christmas Carols” I’ve seen, this one visually gets me most in the cheerful, holiday mood.
As highlighted in the opening, the always reliable Kelsey Grammer is our Ebenezer Scrooge for this outing.
He plays up the theatrics without adding too much to the character, and while not one of the absolute best portrayals, he’s consistently fun to watch, and still has some subtle moments to shine. I’d say for the first half, I felt I was watching the actor put on a performance, but as the film goes on, I begin to see the character more than the actor. By the end, Kelsey Grammer delivers the goods and makes for a passable portrayal of Mr. Scrooge.
Also, sense this version aims to be a fun take on a familiar story, as opposed to a faithful adaptation of the source material, I feel it can get away with select changes in the story and character of Scrooge. For instance, when we go into Scrooge’s backstory, this version takes inspiration from the upbringing and childhood of the author Charles Dickens himself. We see that Scrooges father was arrested for failing to pay debts, which is the base point for Ebenezers obsession to cling to money, and fear of poverty. I personally don’t mind this change, as it fits in line with the character, and helps separate this movie from other adaptations. On a side note, Scrooge’s mother is wonderfully cast by Ruthie Henshall, who delivers some of the best singing and emotional beats of any character in a very short amount of screen time.
Another added detail I love is that this movie takes a page from “The Wizard of Oz”, and has Scrooge meet all three spirits in some kind of human form before he goes on his magical journey.
The spirits of the past, present and future are first seen as a lamp-lighter, a newspaper seller and a blind beggar woman, before revealing their true spiritual identities, which again gives this version an identity different from other film adaptions. Jane Krakowski plays the Ghost of Christmas Past and can best be described as “Pinocchio’s Blue Fairy”, if she was a flashy show girl. It’s not what I’d call a definitive take on the character … but I’m not going to act like I don’t enjoy it either. Jane Krakowski would play another flashy show girl in an even more over the top holiday musical ... the 2017 special "A Christmas Story Live!". My favorite performance of the film is Jesse L. Martin as the Ghost of Christmas Present, who gives the character a witty personality all his own, has a great singing voice, and can also sell the dramatic and potent elements the supernatural entity requires. Jesse L. Martin also shined in both the Broadway and 2005 movie musical "Rent".
I also like that we get more scenes of Scrooges underpaid employee Bob Cratchit bonding with his ailing son Tiny Tim before Scrooge goes on his journey, which gives both their characters a little more presence in the story. One of the most interesting additions to this film is a new little girl character named Grace, who seems to observe Scrooge on his journey, and determine how much he’s changed. I love this little moment during Scrooges trip through the Present, as he spots Grace in a crowd, and gives her a gift out of genuine thoughtfulness. It’s a great touch, and the character again is just one of those unique details that gives this movie a personality different from other film versions.
During our trip to the past, we spend a decent amount of time with young Scrooge and his beautiful young love interest, who’s named Emily in this version.
Best of all, she's played by the delightful Jeffifer Love Hewitt. Ever sense I saw “I Know What
You Did Last Summer” in my early teen years, Jeffifer Love Hewitt was one
of my young crushes, and was always a welcome screen presence. Brian Bedford is
also very good as Mr. Fezziwig, and I like that we get a little more focus on how
Ebenezer callously discarded him, after he was a surrogate father figure.
The weakest part of the film unfortunately is the Ghost of Christmas Future, played in this film by Geraldine Chaplin. I wouldn’t have minded seeing the old beggar woman as the spirit of “things yet to be”, as long as she was wearing a veil to cover her face, but seeing her exposed face robs the entity of its mystique.
That, and her final form of a mute enchantress figure clad in white … looks absolutely ridiculous and is a far cry from the more traditional faceless phantom of both the book and other film depictions. Most of the future sequence in this film comes off as rushed and lacks both the dread, tension and pathos required of this scene. I do at least like Scrooges reaction to his grave site, as he isn’t taking off guard, was almost anticipating this outcome, and while he still pleads forgiveness, Kelsy Grammer delivers an admirably restrained, yet still emotional performance. Also, for all my issues with the future sequence, I feel everything balances out with its resolution, in which Scrooge briefly reunites with his late mother and sister amidst a singing quire. It’s my favorite scene of the whole film, and subsequently one of my favorite moments of any “Christmas Carol” adaptation.
Finally, I have to talk about the musical numbers themselves, because as far as I’m concerned, this film features one of my favorite song-selections of any holiday picture.
The Ghost of Christmas Present sings “Abundance and Charity”, which is the most theatrical, decorative and bombastic number, but still very fun. When looking back at his childhood, he’s reminded of the love he shared for his sister, which is effectively utilized through their childhood song “A Place Called Home”. The song comes back a second time as a romantic duet between the teenage Scrooge and his beautiful love interest Emily, and it’s really a wholesome romantic piece. The Ghost of the past sings “The Lights of Long Ago”, which is suitably whimsical, and a fitting piece for the character. The song “Christmas Together” is a straightforward celebration piece, showing how all the people of London come together, and spread the joy of the season. It’s absolutely in spirit with the source material, and it’s hard for me not to have a big smile on my face whenever I watch this scene play out.
Of course, the main highlight of any “Christmas Carol” adaption is Scrooge’s reformation, which is punctuated by the song “God Bless us Everyone”. This triumphant musical number effectively captures both the tone and message of the original Dicken’s classic, and I love how this too is utilized more than once in the film. First, it’s a dramatic baled sung by Scrooge’s mother in the past. Then finally at the end, this song makes for a triumphant climax to Scrooge’s journey, as he reforms and becomes a better man who’s ready to give to those in need and celebrate the Christmas season. The statement “God Bless us Everyone” was already the most famous line from the novel, and it’s only fitting to stand as the best song in this musical adaption … as well as one of my personal favorite songs from any Christmas movie or special I’ve seen.
In the end, I can see this film leaving audiences with varying reactions … it might be just a little too corny and over the top for some … it could be pleasant and enjoyable for others … honestly, it’s a love it or hate it movie experience. I can only speak for myself when I say … I’m quite fond of this movie musical.
I love most of the songs, the personality is upbeat, it’s visually appealing, and the cast seems to be having a lot of fun, which absolutely carries over to me. I certainly wouldn’t call this any kind of definitive version … it’s honestly more of a guilty pleasure on my part … and there's obviously other versions I like more, but I can’t help enjoying this musical for the splendid little escape it is. I can respect why most fans would right this movie off as campy, but for me, it’s a completely different experience from the other films, while still maintaining just enough spirit of the classic novel, and that for me is enough to make this version work, and a personal favorite all the same.
Thanks for reading my review of the 2004 holiday
special “A Christmas Carol: The Musical” … and continue to enjoy the
movies and musicals you love!